ELECAM and The Conundrum of Election Rigging in Cameroon

By Frankline C. Kimbeng*

What is being foisted on Africa is a version of liberal democracy reduced to the crude simplicity of multiparty elections. This type of democracy is not in the least emancipatory, especially in African conditions, because it offers the people rights they cannot exercise, voting that never amount to choosing, freedom which is patiently spurious, and political equality which disguises highly unequal power relations (Ake, 1996).  Cameroon’s successive history of flawed elections and our so called “advanced” democracy depicts the above assertion.  

Such unequal power relations in Cameroon politics reached its heights during the July 22, 2007 municipal and parliamentary elections. There is evidence to suggest that they were the worst elections ever to be “organized” in the country.  Marred by  vote rigging, corruption, vote buying, , lack of transparency, ballot snatching at gun points, criminal manipulation of voters' list and brazen falsification of election results, this election was at its best an assault on and abolition of the Cameroon electorate. The obvious bias and partisanship of the Ministry of Territorial Administration and Decentralisation (MINATD), National Election Observatory (ONEL/NEO) was central to the failure of the elections.

Most of the decisions taken by the MINATD/ONEL and the Supreme Court were clearly the wish or desire of President Paul Biya in favour of his Rassemblement démocratique du Peuple Camerounais, (RDPC) party. Why ELECAM should  Not Compromised Future Elections. Flawed election is dangerous and fatal to the existence of a country. From Nigeria to Zimbabwe, Kenya to DRC, massive rigging of elections has deprived the governments of legitimacy. Although such a governments might be “legal”, they nevertheless 1ack the moral authority or legitimacy to command the respect of the people.

Second, if we agree that elections are a sine qua non for democracy, their free and fair conduct is necessary to allow citizens to use elections as mechanisms of accountability. Therefore, flawed elections weakens accounts for the tremendous loss of faith by the public in the electoral process and contribute to the erosion of confidence in elections  as the best means to bring about much desired democratic change (Kale, 2008). 

Third, flawed elections delegitimises the moral stand of society in the eyes of all, especially the young and impressionable. Worse, If society’s youth in particular realise that the political leaders, role, models, who speak in high sounding language about rigor and moralization, “advanced democracy”; the rule of law are in fact cheats, willing to falsify documents and engage in multiple thumb printing, sustaining important societal values, such as the truth", honesty, the triumph of good over evil, become extremely hollow platitudes. Cheating and dishonesty become acceptable. Yes under these circumstances, in such elections attract crooks and the most corrupt are always the winners. 

Under such a scenario, political space becomes chaotic; governance becomes elusive, unreal and a mirage in nature. It is unfortunate that our past election gives credence to this. Instead of the electioneering process in Cameroon improving, it is deteriorating. Massive rigging of elections has what I term “rigging multiplier” effect on society. Anyone familiar with the organization of previous elections in Cameroon has seen how, from 1992, rigging has grown steadily worse and more daring.  The result is the installation of dubious political leaders that have helped to promote corruption, lack of accountability and terse development of human and material resources in our country. 

In civilized societies, most will agree that elections represent the only legal way by which the people or aggrieved sections can change the direction of the affairs of the society from the situation they find unacceptable.  Electoral fraud thus compounds the social choice problems that already exist in aggregating preferences into outcomes that arise from extant challenges in translating vote shares into seat shares (Lehouq 2002).  As a consequence, poorly performing politicians remain in office.

Also,   where free and fair elections is no longer possible, civil conflicts and electoral violence becomes the only option.  Like    present day Cameroon, Kenya at the time   presented a striking example of an African country that had long painted a picture of relative  peace while camouflaging the political and economic fragility that gradually destroyed the country from within (Giegon, 2009).   Therefore, most of the conflicts in SSA in recent years as were the case in the Ivory Coast and Kenya can ruin a country's progress and reverse their development.

Conclusion and Lessons for Cameroonians

There is no doubt that Cameroonians have for long shouldered the burden of such malpractices. There is also no doubt that the onus for change in Cameroon lies squarely on our shoulders and the operational independence of ELECAM. It has been documented that a few years ago, John Attah Mills was sworn in as the President of Ghana. 

President Mills party which was in the opposition won a hard fought election.  Like previous organised  elections in Cameroon, the election in Ghana had all the problems associated with Sub-Saharan African politics, namely; the deployment of cross-cutting but resilient issues of tension, conflicts,  corruption, strong ethnic/ tribal interests, money politics and partly the misuse of law enforcement, yet the will of the people prevailed. How? One man, Kwadoo Afari Gyam, the Chairman of Ghana Electoral Commission, and the umpire refused to rig the vote (Osinbajo, 2009).  

At the end of the day, credible and enduring institutions and great societies are built on the diligence, integrity and courage of ordinary men and women who understand that the future of their societies frequently depends on just one person here and there doing the right thing.  This is in accordance with  Samuel Adam's view that: "It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate tireless minority to set brushfires in people's minds". That is the lesson that Cameroonians , Mr. Mohaman Sani Tanimou  and ELECAM should take home.

*Founders’ Forum Fellow - American Society For Public Administration
Louisiana, USA

Comments

[Belstaff Coat]

I like the writing structure of your blog and it does a pretty decent job of presenting the material.

[fall protection]

Election rigging invalidates many democratic ideas. Thankfully the only rigging I engage in is one that ensures fall protection.